Free Screen Capture Tools: What Actually Works
January 16, 2026
I went through maybe six or seven free screen capture tools before I stopped switching. Most of them I installed, used once, and either forgot about or uninstalled because something weird happened during a recording. One kept saving files somewhere I couldn't find. I don't know where. I just started over with a different one.
Turns out the built-in stuff on my machine covered probably 80% of what I actually needed. The rest I handled with one free alternative that Nate mentioned offhand. Took me about 11 minutes to get a clean capture I could actually send to a client.
Windows Snipping Tool: Already on Your Computer
I didn't even realize it was already on my computer until Nate mentioned it in a call. I'd been downloading other stuff for months. Felt a little stupid about that.
The shortcut took me a while to get right. I kept hitting Windows + S by accident and pulling up search. Took maybe three or four tries before my fingers learned the actual combination. Once it clicked, I was capturing screenshots in probably under four seconds flat, start to finish.
I spent a good chunk of time trying to get the text extraction to work the way I thought it worked. I assumed it pulled text from a screenshot I'd already taken. It doesn't do that, or at least I couldn't get it to. Turns out you point it at something on your screen live and it copies the text directly. Once I figured out I was doing it backwards, it actually worked fine. I used it maybe a dozen times after that without a problem.
The color picker surprised me. I was grabbing hex codes off a vendor's site for something Cal was putting together, and I didn't have to open anything else. That was genuinely useful. I don't know all the format options it gives you but I only needed the one.
What worked: Fast, nothing to install, good enough for dropping into an email or a quick Slack message. Annotations are basic but I used them.
What didn't: No scrolling capture. I had a long internal doc I needed to grab and ended up stitching three separate screenshots together manually. Also no way to share a link directly from it, which I kept expecting to exist.
Fine for quick grabs. Not the thing if you're building anything that needs to look deliberate.
Mac Screenshot Tool: Command + Shift + 5
Price: I honestly don't know what I paid for this. Nothing, I think. It came with the laptop.
I used the wrong shortcut for the first two weeks. I kept hitting Shift + Cmd + 4 out of habit, which still works, but it skips the toolbar entirely. I didn't know there was a toolbar until Petra mentioned it. Once I found it, things made more sense. You get options for the full screen, a window, or just a region you drag out yourself.
The window capture was the thing I actually needed. It pulls the window out with a transparent background, which saved me probably 20 minutes per documentation screenshot I was doing. I ran about 34 screenshots across two internal guides before I stopped manually cutting out backgrounds in another app. Should have found that option sooner.
There's also screen recording in the same toolbar. I didn't expect that. It works fine. Nothing fancy.
The markup tools show up after you click the thumbnail in the corner. Shapes, arrows, text, a magnifier. I used the magnifier once by accident and couldn't figure out how to undo it fast enough. It works, it's just not deep.
What's good: transparent window captures, screen recording included, timed delays, cursor toggle, clean enough to stay out of the way.
What sucks: no scrolling capture, no cloud upload, annotations feel like a placeholder, shortcuts take adjustment.
Good for basic screenshots and the occasional recording. Not for anything that needs real editing after.
ShareX: Power User Paradise (Windows Only)
I downloaded this thing expecting something like the basic Windows snipping tool but with a few extra buttons. That is not what this is. I spent probably forty minutes just clicking through menus before I even took a screenshot. There's a workflow builder in there that I accidentally triggered and it started uploading every capture to an FTP server I'd half-configured. I didn't know I had an FTP server. I don't think I do. I unchecked something and it stopped.
Once I figured out the hotkey setup, it got faster. I set one key to grab a region, drop a watermark on it, and copy the link. That part actually worked. I had around 30 annotated screenshots processed and organized before I would have finished manually uploading a handful with the tool I used before.
The scrolling capture surprised me. I was expecting to have to stitch pages together myself like I used to do. It just... detected the scroll region and handled it. I tested it on a few long docs and it didn't break until I hit something with a weird sticky header. That one I had to redo manually.
The image effects panel is where I lost another stretch of time. There's a shadow and padding tool that makes captures look polished, but I kept applying effects in the wrong order and stacking them. Nate looked over and said it looked like a screenshot inside a screenshot. He was right. Once I reversed the sequence it was fine.
What works: Completely free, no watermarks, no tier system I could find. Scrolling capture. Screen recording with audio. Hotkey workflows once you've set them up correctly. Auto-upload to a long list of destinations. OCR pull. Color picker. Step annotations.
What doesn't: The settings are a wall. The learning curve is real and it costs you time upfront. Only runs on Windows. Documentation exists but I kept landing on the wrong page.
If you're taking screenshots constantly and want the whole process automated, this will eventually do exactly that. If you open it once a week, you'll relearn it every time.
Greenshot: Simple and Free (But Aging)
I grabbed this one because Nate said it was what he used before switching to something heavier. Installation took maybe two minutes. I had it capturing screenshots before I figured out where the settings were.
The editor is basic but it's there. Arrows, text boxes, a highlighter. I used the blur tool for about a week before I realized there wasn't one and I'd just been drawing white rectangles over things. It worked fine. Nobody said anything.
The hotkey setup is where I lost some time. I had it mapped to a key that something else already owned, so for a few days I thought the capture wasn't working. It was working. I just wasn't looking in the right folder. Once I sorted that out I was probably capturing and annotating screenshots in under 30 seconds per shot, which is faster than what I was doing before.
Export goes straight to email or a folder you pick. I had it pointed at the wrong folder for a while. That's on me.
Where it gets complicated: development has basically stopped. There's no video, no scrolling capture, and if you're not on Windows you're paying for a version that feels older than the free one. I'd use it for internal documentation or quick annotations, but I wouldn't build a client-facing workflow around something that isn't getting patched regularly.
Cal asked me if it was worth switching to. I said probably not if he needed anything beyond static screenshots. He switched anyway and then asked me how to do scrolling capture. I didn't have an answer.
Flameshot: The Linux Champion (Cross-Platform)
Price: Free and open source
Platform: Linux, Windows, macOS
I run Linux at home and Windows at work, and I spent probably the first three days using the wrong capture mode entirely. I kept launching the full-screen grab instead of the region selector. They're both in the right-click menu and I just kept hitting the wrong one. Once I sorted that out, I stopped thinking about the tool and just used it.
The annotation stuff is where I actually slowed down and paid attention. I was marking up a UI screenshot for Petra and I accidentally hit the pixelate tool instead of blur. They do basically the same thing so I left it. Nobody said anything. The arrows and text labels are genuinely fast to place - I put together about 11 annotated screenshots for a handoff doc in under 20 minutes, which used to take me a lot longer with whatever I was using before.
The pin-to-desktop thing took me a while to find. I didn't realize it was there. Cal mentioned it offhand and I went looking for it. Now I use it constantly - I'll keep a reference screenshot floating while I'm working in another window.
It doesn't do video. I thought it might, searched the menus for a while, then asked Jake, who confirmed it just doesn't. That's fine. It does one thing and it's fast.
Good for: Linux users, anyone who wants something that gets out of the way. Bad for: Anyone who needs video or scrolling capture.
Ksnip: The Qt-Based Alternative
I grabbed this one because Nate said it ran better on his Linux setup than the other options we tried. He was right, mostly. It installed without issues and the Qt thing means it doesn't feel janky switching between machines -- I used it on my work Linux box and then on a Windows laptop the same afternoon and it behaved the same way both times. That part was genuinely good.
Where I lost time: I kept re-selecting the capture region manually for each screenshot. Turns out there's a repeat capture option that locks to the same area automatically. I did not find this for the first two days. I was doing maybe 40 screenshots for a process doc and re-drawing the region every single time. Once I found it, the whole job took about 20 minutes instead of whatever I was doing before.
The blur tool worked fine. I used it to redact some internal data before sending screenshots to a vendor. The pin-to-desktop thing I tried once and then forgot about.
What's good: free, consistent across platforms, repeat capture once you find it, blur and annotation are solid, no Electron bloat
What sucks: documentation is thin, no video, smaller community so you're mostly figuring things out yourself
One of the better free screen capture tools if you're working across systems and don't need it to look impressive.
Lightshot: Fast Screenshots, Privacy Questions
Price: Free
Platform: Windows, Mac, Chrome, Firefox, Opera
I grabbed this one because Nate said it was fast and he wasn't wrong. Hit Print Screen, drag a box, done. First time I used it I had a link in my clipboard before I even realized it had uploaded somewhere. I didn't set that up intentionally. It just did it.
That's also the problem. I sent maybe six or seven screenshots to Petra before I noticed the URLs were just... open. No login. No password. Anyone with the link could see them. I assumed there was a privacy setting I'd missed so I spent probably twenty minutes looking for a way to make uploads private. There isn't one. That's just how it works.
I ended up using it only for stuff I didn't care about -- browser errors, layout questions, nothing sensitive. Took me about nine screenshots before I stopped defaulting to it for anything work-related.
What works: Fastest capture-to-share flow I've used. Browser extension is seamless. No watermarks, no friction.
What doesn't: Public URLs with no private option. No video. Development looks like it stopped a while back.
Good for quick, low-stakes sharing. Not for anything you'd hesitate to post publicly.
OBS Studio: Overkill for Screenshots, Perfect for Recording
Price: Free. I honestly don't know if there's a paid version somewhere. I never found one.
Platform: Windows, Mac, Linux
I downloaded this because Nate said it was the best of the free screen capture tools for recording video. He wasn't wrong, but he also didn't warn me it would take two hours before I recorded a single thing.
The first problem was that I set up my scene before configuring the output settings, which apparently matters. My first three recordings saved as MKV files and I couldn't open them in anything I had. I switched to MP4 and that fixed it. I don't know why MKV is the default. I'm sure there's a reason.
Once I got it working, the quality was genuinely good. I recorded about 40 minutes of tutorial footage over a few sessions and nothing dropped or stuttered. I was running hardware encoding without fully understanding what that meant -- I just picked the option that had GPU in the name and it worked. CPU stayed low. That part was fine.
The scene system took me a while to understand because I kept trying to edit the scene while it was live. You can't do that, or you can but it changes the recording in real time, which is not what I wanted. I had a webcam showing up in four recordings before I figured out how to keep it off by default.
Audio was more capable than I needed. I had three input options and spent time setting levels on sources I never actually used.
What worked:
No watermarks, no recording limits, no prompts to upgrade anything. Hardware encoding once I found the right setting. Stable across long sessions.
What didn't:
Not beginner-friendly at all. Took me until the third session before setup felt automatic. No screenshot function, no editing, nothing happens until you already know what you're doing.
Good for recording. Not much else.
Mac-Specific Alternatives Worth Considering
I started with the paid Mac one because Nate had it and kept making screenshots that looked like they came from a design agency. I assumed there was a filter or something. There isn't. It just does that automatically. I spent probably twenty minutes looking for where to turn off the drop shadows before I realized I actually wanted them there. The desktop-hiding thing caught me off guard too. I didn't know it was running until I looked at a screenshot and my whole desktop was just gone, clean. Took me a second to figure out what happened. Once I understood it I left it on. The annotation tools felt like something that actually belonged on a Mac, not ported over from Windows. I used it for a full client documentation batch, maybe forty screenshots in one sitting, and nothing slowed down or got weird. For what it costs it's the benchmark I compare everything else against now.
The free Mac-native one I tested after that was faster in a way I noticed immediately. I hit the shortcut and the capture was already done before I'd finished thinking about it. I ran OCR on a screenshot of a pricing table someone sent me as an image, just to see if it worked, and it pulled the text correctly on the first try. I tested it maybe eleven or twelve times across different screenshots before I trusted it enough to use it on real work. The pixel ruler I set up wrong at first. I was measuring from the wrong anchor point and getting numbers that didn't match what Helen was seeing on her end. Once I figured out I had to click before dragging it made sense. No cost for the core stuff, which is what I needed.
The auto-beautify one was the most confusing to start. I kept capturing things and wondering why they looked different from what was on my screen. The padding and background are just on by default. I turned them off, then turned them back on after I sent one flat screenshot to Jake and he asked why it looked rough. Fair point. The annotations are fine, nothing special. The main thing it does well is make a screenshot look finished without any extra steps. I used it for three app store images and didn't have to open anything else afterward. The cloud situation I still don't fully understand. I've just been dragging files out manually, which takes an extra few seconds but works.
Monosnap I tried last. The blur tool was actually why I came to it. I needed to redact something in a screenshot fast and didn't want to go into another app. It worked, took me about forty seconds total including finding the tool. The free version has a storage limit I bumped into around the second week. I'm not totally sure what the paid tiers cover. I didn't upgrade. For non-commercial use it's fine. For anything ongoing at a business level you'd probably need to look at the plan details more carefully than I did. It sits somewhere between basic and full-featured, which is either perfect or frustrating depending on what you're trying to do.
If you're comparing free screen capture tools on Mac specifically, the fast native one is where I'd start. The beautify one has a narrower use case but it's genuinely good at that one thing. The paid premium option is worth it if you're doing this kind of work every day. Monosnap I'd use again for the blur tool alone.
Browser Extensions for Quick Web Captures
GoFullPage: Scrolling Captures in Browser
Browser extensions can capture full web pages without installing desktop software. GoFullPage is the simplest - press Alt+Shift+P, watch it capture the entire page, then download as image or PDF.
It works in Chrome, Firefox, and Edge. No account required, no uploads to external servers. Everything stays local. Perfect for archiving web pages or capturing long articles.
Awesome Screenshot: Browser-Based Editing
Awesome Screenshot combines capture and editing in browser. Annotate immediately after capturing without switching apps. Upload to their cloud or download locally.
The free version has limitations. Pro features like video recording, blur tools, and cloud storage require payment. But for basic web captures with annotations, it works.
When Free Tools Aren't Enough
I grabbed one of the free screen capture tools first because it seemed like enough. It was, until Helen asked me to send her the onboarding flow with steps numbered on the screenshots. I spent probably 45 minutes trying to fake that with the built-in markup. It looked bad. She didn't say anything but I could tell.
The free version also couldn't capture the full scrolling page. I took maybe six separate screenshots and stitched them together in a way that didn't really work. I don't know why I did it that way. There was probably a simpler option I missed.
I switched to the paid tool after that. First week I documented three full workflows in about 40 minutes total. Same thing before was taking me most of an afternoon. The scrolling capture worked immediately. I didn't set anything up wrong, which was surprising.
If you're taking a handful of screenshots and dropping them straight into Slack, the free screen capture tools are genuinely fine. If you're making actual documentation, they will slow you down in ways that feel small until they aren't.
Comparison Table: Key Features at a Glance
| Tool | Platform | Price | Scrolling Capture | Video Recording | Annotation | Cloud Upload |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Windows Snipping Tool | Windows | Free | No | No | Basic | No |
| Mac Screenshot | macOS | Free | No | Yes | Basic | No |
| ShareX | Windows | Free | Yes | Yes | Advanced | Yes (80+ services) |
| Greenshot | Win/Mac | Free/Paid | No | No | Good | Limited |
| Flameshot | Linux/Win/Mac | Free | No | No | Excellent | Imgur |
| Ksnip | Cross-platform | Free | No | No | Good | Imgur |
| Lightshot | Win/Mac | Free | No | No | Basic | Yes (public) |
| OBS Studio | Win/Mac/Linux | Free | N/A | Professional | No | No |
| Shottr | macOS | Free | Yes | No | Excellent | Optional |
| CleanShot X | macOS | $29 | Yes | Yes | Excellent | Yes |
Common Use Cases: What Tool to Choose
Software documentation was the first thing I tried to get right. I spent probably two sessions figuring out the scrolling capture before I realized I had the wrong capture mode selected the whole time. Once I fixed that, the numbered annotations worked the way I needed. Shottr on Mac was easier to set up than I expected. Took me about 23 minutes to get a consistent style across a full doc.
For bug reports, I defaulted to whatever was already installed for longer than I should have. The blur tool was buried somewhere I didn't find until Nate pointed it out. After that it was fine. Nothing fancy needed here. If you're filing more than a few a week, something with better annotation controls is worth the extra setup time.
Tutorial content is where I had the most trouble. OBS took me a full afternoon to configure correctly and I still had the audio routing wrong for the first few recordings. Once it was working it was genuinely good. I paired it with Descript for editing, which helped. For screenshots, the numbered step automation saved me real time once I stopped overcomplicating the workflow.
Marketing screenshots I mostly handed off to Petra. The styling features worked but I kept applying effects in the wrong order and getting weird shadows.
For quick team communication, speed matters more than anything. I used Lightshot for non-sensitive stuff and it was fine. Never used it for anything I wouldn't want living on a public server.
Code work was where I felt least prepared. The color picker and pixel measurement tools were there, I just didn't know I needed them until Cal mentioned it.
Installation and Setup Guide
Setting Up ShareX (Windows)
Download from getsharex.com, Microsoft Store, or Steam. All versions are identical. After installation:
- Open Hotkey Settings - configure Capture Region to Print Screen (or your preferred key)
- Go to After Capture Tasks - enable "Show quick task menu" or "Upload image to host"
- Set Destinations - choose Imgur for quick sharing or configure your own cloud storage
- Enable Scrolling Capture in Capture menu
- Test workflow: capture region, verify upload, confirm URL copied to clipboard
For advanced users: configure workflows for automatic watermarking, create image effect presets with shadows and borders, set up custom FTP destinations.
Setting Up Flameshot (Linux)
Install via package manager: sudo apt install flameshot on Ubuntu/Debian, or download from Flathub.
- Set keyboard shortcut: System Settings → Keyboard → Custom Shortcuts
- Command:
flameshot gui - Bind to Print Screen key
- Configure default save directory in Flameshot settings
- Set up Imgur integration if desired
Setting Up OBS Studio for Screen Recording
- Download from obsproject.com and install
- Run Auto-Configuration Wizard on first launch - select "Optimize for Recording"
- Create a scene: Click + in Scenes panel, name it "Screen Recording"
- Add Display Capture source: Click + in Sources, select Display Capture, choose your monitor
- Configure Output Settings: Settings → Output → Recording Quality → High Quality, Medium File Size
- Set recording format to MP4
- Configure hotkeys: Settings → Hotkeys → Start Recording/Stop Recording
- Test recording: Start Recording, wait 10 seconds, Stop Recording, check output
For better quality: use hardware encoder (NVENC, QuickSync, or AMF) if available, set bitrate to 40-60 Mbps for 1080p 60fps, enable separate audio tracks for system and mic audio.
Troubleshooting Common Issues
ShareX Not Capturing Windows Properly
If ShareX shows black screens when capturing specific windows, the application is using hardware acceleration. Solution: In ShareX, go to Task Settings → Capture → Screen capture method → Try "Windows GDI" or "DirectX" modes.
For games, use Game Capture mode instead of Window Capture. Enable "Use different source settings for fullscreen mode" if needed.
OBS Black Screen on Capture
Most common OBS issue. Causes: hardware acceleration in the app you're capturing, or incorrect graphics mode.
Solutions:
- Run OBS as Administrator
- Right-click OBS → Properties → Compatibility → Disable fullscreen optimizations
- In Display Capture properties, try different capture methods
- For laptops with dual GPUs: force OBS to use dedicated GPU in Windows Graphics Settings
- Update GPU drivers
Built-in Tools Not Saving Screenshots
Windows: Check if Screenshots folder exists in Pictures. If Snipping Tool fails to save, reset the app: Settings → Apps → Snipping Tool → Advanced Options → Reset.
Mac: Check screenshot save location: Open Screenshot app (Shift+Cmd+5) → Options → Save to → select destination. If thumbnails don't appear, restart your Mac.
Keyboard Shortcuts Conflicting
Multiple screenshot tools create hotkey conflicts. Disable built-in shortcuts if using third-party tools.
Windows: Can't fully disable without registry edits. Instead, set Snipping Tool to a different key combo.
Mac: System Preferences → Keyboard → Shortcuts → Screenshots → uncheck or change shortcuts.
Privacy and Security Considerations
Screenshots often contain sensitive information accidentally. Email addresses, API keys, account numbers, personal data - all easily captured and shared.
Best Practices for Sensitive Screenshots
- Use local-only tools for sensitive content: Built-in OS tools, Flameshot (without upload), ShareX with local save
- Avoid cloud-upload tools: Lightshot, Gyazo, and similar services create public URLs
- Review before sharing: Check for visible passwords, API keys, personal information, confidential data
- Use redaction tools: Blur or pixelate sensitive areas before sharing
- Disable auto-upload: In ShareX and similar tools, disable automatic uploading to cloud services
- Clear metadata: Screenshots contain timestamp and sometimes location data
Enterprise Considerations
For businesses handling customer data or proprietary information:
- Mandate local-only screenshot tools
- Block upload-based tools at firewall level
- Train employees on screenshot security
- Use paid tools with enterprise controls (Snagit, Droplr, Zight)
- Implement DLP policies that scan outgoing images
Advanced Techniques and Productivity Tips
Creating Screenshot Templates in ShareX
ShareX can add watermarks, borders, and consistent styling automatically. Create an image effect preset:
- After capture tasks → Add image effects
- Add effects: Reflection, Shadow, Canvas padding
- Save as preset (e.g., "Documentation Style")
- Enable "Add image effects" in After capture tasks
Now every screenshot automatically gets consistent styling.
Batch Processing Screenshots
If you need to annotate or resize dozens of screenshots:
ShareX: Use Image Editor batch mode - open multiple images, apply changes, save all at once.
Command line tools: ImageMagick for batch resizing, watermarking, or format conversion:
mogrify -resize 1920x1080 -quality 85 *.pngOrganizing Screenshot Libraries
Built-in tools save to default folders. For better organization:
- Create project-specific folders: Client projects, documentation, bug reports
- Use ShareX custom save patterns: %y-%mo-%d-%h-%mi-%s_{custom_text}
- Name screenshots descriptively immediately after capture
- Use tagging systems if your tool supports it (Snagit)
- Automated cleanup: Delete screenshots older than 30 days from temp folders
Keyboard Shortcut Optimization
Default shortcuts are often inconvenient. Optimize for your workflow:
- Most common action (region capture) → easiest key (Print Screen)
- Second most common (full screen) → one modifier (Shift + Print Screen)
- Rarely used actions → multiple modifiers
- Keep shortcuts consistent across tools if using multiple
- Avoid conflicts with other applications you use frequently
Platform-Specific Recommendations
I run Windows at work and ended up with three free screen capture tools installed before I figured out which one to actually use. The main one does everything - screenshots, scrolling captures, annotations, video. I had the video recording pointed at the wrong monitor for probably two weeks before Nate noticed my recordings were just showing my taskbar. I don't know how I missed that. Just changed the source and it worked fine.
On my Mac at home I use a different tool for fast grabs. The built-in shortcut handles video when I need it. I kept forgetting the key combination so I wrote it on a sticky note. That's still on my monitor.
Helen uses Linux and swears by Flameshot. She said Ksnip is better for repetitive captures but I haven't tried it. I took her word for it.
For anyone jumping between machines, I'd just pick the same free screen capture tools across all of them. Consistency matters more than optimal. I got through about 40 documented workflows before I stopped second-guessing the setup.
The Future of Screenshot Tools
I kept waiting for the AI crop thing to actually work the way I thought it would. It did eventually, but I had it set to the wrong mode for probably the first 6 or 7 captures. Once I figured that out, it started trimming to the right content automatically. The sensitive data blurring is there too, though I missed it the first time because I was looking in the wrong menu. Helen noticed it before I did. Most of the smarter features showed up in the paid tier first, which I didn't realize until I'd already spent time looking for them.
What to Actually Use
I went through maybe six or seven free screen capture tools before I stopped switching. Here's where I landed.
Basic screenshots: The built-in OS tools handle most of it. I use the Mac one probably 40 times a day and never think about it.
Windows, if you want more: I set up the freeware option with the automation features running before I understood what half the settings did. Took me about three sessions to stop capturing the wrong region. Once I figured out which output folder it was actually saving to, it was fine.
Mac: I tried the free lightweight option first, then paid for the upgraded version after Petra mentioned she'd been using it for months. That was the right call. Faster than anything I'd used before.
Screen recording: OBS took me longer than it should have. I had the audio routed wrong for probably the first 11 recordings. But it's free and nothing else does what it does. I pair it with Descript for cleanup.
Team docs: We eventually paid for Snagit. The free tools stopped working for us around the time Cal needed annotation markup on shared files. Try Close for managing that workflow.
Avoid: The one that auto-uploads. I didn't realize it was public until Nate pointed out the link.
The Real Question: Do You Need a Tool at All?
Before I downloaded anything, Nate told me to just try the keyboard shortcut built into Windows. I didn't believe him. I spent maybe 40 minutes looking at free screen capture tools before I even tried it. Turns out Windows + Shift + S does most of what I needed. I felt a little stupid about that.
Mac has something similar. Shift + Cmd + 5. Linux depends on what desktop you're running, which I learned the hard way because I was on the wrong one.
If the built-in option doesn't fit how you work, then yeah, look elsewhere. But I'd try what's already on your machine first. I wish I had.
For more guides, see our pages on best screen recording software and video editing tools. If screenshots are part of a bigger workflow, Leadpages and Monday.com are worth pairing in.